They have just been found guilty, that's what the ruling is, and the outcome of the ruling is they should delete data derived from the related data. The ML mode

They have just been found guilty, that's what the ruling is, and the outcome of the ruling is they should delete data derived from the related data. The ML models took the data as input, I think it's fair to say that if they want to argue the ML models do not derive from it despite that, they should maintain the burden of proof.