4 ms·
> The sad part is that we could actually solve some real problems by coordinating collective action on, say, starting a new city that's designed around non-moto
by AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y ago
> The sad part is that we could actually solve some real problems by coordinating collective action on, say, starting a new city that's designed around non-motorized transit within the city limits.
In general it would seem that human beings don't actually want to make the world a better place, but if you can find a way to sell it as a get rich quick scheme it might actually work.
- WanderPanda 5y agoMaybe it isn‘t even a better place for the majority? Just a utopia for a few? Take into account that e.g. 20-30% of the population are smokers
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y ago...I don't follow. What does non-motorized transit within city limits have to do with smoking?