3 ms·
In general, I agree that it would be nice. Not sure what the right way to legislate that would be, but I'm sure there are ways. However, if DNT/GPC (which can
by foxfluff 5y ago
In general, I agree that it would be nice. Not sure what the right way to legislate that would be, but I'm sure there are ways.
However, if DNT/GPC (which can signal opt out but not much else) becomes legally binding (as they very well might, with DSA), that'd be a huge win for me personally, because I don't see my self ever consenting, and reading consent dialogs isn't worth my time.
As I understand it, GPC is already legally binding in California thanks to CCPA.
- Xelbair 5y agoNo need for that if they just complied with GDPR. Consent must be given consciously in informed way - therefore NOTHING can be pre-checked by any dialog to make it comply with GDPR. They just need to somehow ban dark patters, or standardize the dialog. To be honest, just one high profile case that interprets dark pattern as 'uninformed consent'(therefore not legal under GDPR) would be enough.