> that you don't think protecting that group is a critically important thing for everyone is very telling. Again you take the worst-case interpretation, with a

> that you don't think protecting that group is a critically important thing for everyone is very telling. Again you take the worst-case interpretation, with a dash of ad hominem, to help you climb that moral high ground you seem fond of. > about how we don't want these features So you speak for the whole of Google's customer base?