> maybe he’s color blind, which then that would be my husband’s fault I've just discovered a huge deficiency in English. In my native language I've got a perfe

> maybe he’s color blind, which then that would be my husband’s fault I've just discovered a huge deficiency in English. In my native language I've got a perfect response: I'm not guilty as I didn't broke any law. Which goes along with both classical nullum crimen sine lege and with UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights no less: > No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. The problem in English is the word "fault", which can mean both "a physical or intellectual imperfection" and "responsibility for wrongdoing" among its many meanings. Phew, try to defend against that, accusation of not being perfect.