3 ms·
Not really. It needs to be more flexible than other current robots, but definitely not AGI.
by TulliusCicero 5y ago
Not really. It needs to be more flexible than other current robots, but definitely not AGI.
- graderjs 5y agoReally? You think full autonomous that's better than human drivers is not AGI? Perhaps time will tell if your opinion is right.
- TulliusCicero 5y agoYes, it seems pretty obvious to me. I mean, we already have cars that can handle driving themselves in some contexts (e.g. Waymo in suburban Phoenix) but we're obviously nowhere close to AGI.
- graderjs 5y agoThat's the thing tho. Specialization (in some contexts), versus a general field of endeavor. Plus you got, "handle themselves", versus, better than humans drivers. You may be underestimating how hard that is.