5 ms·
> no one This is an article in the Economist decrying it, so I don't think you can claim that no one is worried.
by jdminhbg 5y ago
> no one
This is an article in the Economist decrying it, so I don't think you can claim that no one is worried.
- codeivore 5y agoyeah, an article in a publication where the authors are anonymous because the views published in it are painfully true enough to make you real life enemies
- biorach 5y agoall of the economist articles are anonymous https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2013/09/04/why-are-the-economists-writers-anonymous https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2013/09/04/...
- wnevets 5y ago>so I don't think you can claim that no one is worried. No that isn't what I claimed, I claimed no one was worried. Using an article written almost two years after fact as proof against my claim doesn't make a whole a lot of sense. Now obviously my no one claim is hyperbole but the fact the bill's passing was near-unanimous is my point. Using one of the very few no votes in congress as proof against my claim would make a lot more sense.
- chrisseaton 5y ago> Now obviously my no one claim is hyperbole Code for 'nonsense but I said it anyway and now someone's calling it out so I'll claim it was a prank all along'.
- wnevets 5y agoYour reading comprehension needs some serious improvement.