> the user went beyond just using something to swap ETH for WETH and instead interacted directly (manually) with the contract Isn't it the "contract" that is s

> the user went beyond just using something to swap ETH for WETH and instead interacted directly (manually) with the contract Isn't it the "contract" that is supposed to be the "smart" thing here? > effectively bypassing the safe-guards that are already in place (even without exchanges) to prevent issues. YTF aren't these "safe-guards" built into the "contract", if it's supposed to be so "smart"? Even the most stupid ordinary non-"smart" conversion program has the "smarts" to reject invalid input, not confiscate it. This whole Crypto/Blockchain business is so obviously bullshit all the way down.