4 ms·
Hopefully people here can do better than get into a flame war when provided with context for weapons technology news and if they can't then they should be down-
by guerrilla 5y ago
Hopefully people here can do better than get into a flame war when provided with context for weapons technology news and if they can't then they should be down-voted and possibly flagged.
- hunterb123 5y agoI believe he was complaining about the lack of context you provided. The dropping of the typical (and false) apartheid accusation without providing the response.
- skinnymuch 5y agoAnother comment responded to that: _"Do you also post Russian or North Korean responses when discussions involving these countries occur?"_ I'd extend that to America or basically any country. I can't imagine it being considered the start to a flame war if some one presents a report by a large organization with some level of reputation without providing the state's response. If there is a report by Amnesty condemning a major issue like the amount of cronyism in all higher levels of the West and America. Or of how lobbying in the US is effectively legalized corruption. Or how [Super] PACs hurt the sanctity of democracy...for any of these things, the official US response or response from any high level of the US government is not that important. I have a hard time imagining being told not including the official western state response is a great way to start a flame war.