4 ms·
I'm not talking about how all companies operate all of the time, I'm talking about how some companies operate an unfortunate number of times. In between these
by vanusa 5y ago
I'm not talking about how all companies operate all of the time, I'm talking about how some companies operate an unfortunate number of times.
In between these opposite extremes -- your language clearly indicates that you think this level of what we might call "aggravated bias" (hiring not just someone in your network; but hiring them over a more qualified candidate, presumed to exist and be interested in your opportunity) is commonplace, or something close to it.
Such that in your mind, "including referrals in your hiring funnel" == aggravated bias (in the sense above), basically.
As to the bias stats you liked to: the findings interesting, to say the least -- if they can be validated. Unfortunately the link to the original Payscale "study" seems to be broken (if we can call it that -- since remember, this is the work of a private company, with products to push).
- TameAntelope 5y ago> Such that in your mind, "including referrals in your hiring funnel" == aggravated bias (in the sense above), basically. Can you show where I said anything approaching this? I do not believe this, nor do I believe I said or even suggested this to be the case.
- vanusa 5y agoI'm asserting the practice among those in power of favoring relatives, friends, or even friends of friends over other, more qualified candidates is a contributing factor to that diversity problem.
- TameAntelope 5y agoNot sure where in that statement I referenced hiring funnels.
- vanusa 5y agoI'd continue, but you're getting awful slippery.
- TameAntelope 5y agoYou made an assumption that turned out not to be true. That's okay, it happens!
- CRConrad 5y ago"Referenced", in the sense of even bringing it up in a discussion all about hiring funnels, perhaps?