3 ms·
It's gotten better but I wouldn't say it isn't bad. A big part of the problem is not having an easy way to access it. Similarly, -ProfileManager has existed fo
by BeefWellington 5y ago
It's gotten better but I wouldn't say it isn't bad. A big part of the problem is not having an easy way to access it.
Similarly, -ProfileManager has existed for ages and that experience is also bad.
If I have to go to the lengths of about:profiles or using the -ProfileManager or -P command-line switches, why not just sandbox the entire thing?
It definitely needs a useability upgrade.
- jatone 5y agoi refuse to use it given how bad the ux is. which is unfortunate because its a killer feature and why I can't recommend firefox over chrome. basic ux.
- charcircuit 5y ago>A big part of the problem is not having an easy way to access it. I've never had any issues typing "about:profiles" into the URL bar. It even autocompletes.