3 ms·
The difference being that with nuclear mutually assured destruction, the actual leaders are assured of their own personal destruction.
by hanoz 5y ago
The difference being that with nuclear mutually assured destruction, the actual leaders are assured of their own personal destruction.
- quickthrower2 5y agoAre they? Who has the best bunkers? Who has dedicated aircraft you can live in permanently?
- gruez 5y ago>Who has dedicated aircraft you can live in permanently? permanently? Probably impossible with current technology. Your best bet is still an underground bunker. If it has to be moving you'll need something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowpiercer_(TV_series)#Premise https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowpiercer_(TV_series)#Premis...
- quickthrower2 5y agoI am assuming landing and refueling is allowed, you can choose a non nuked place for that.
- vkou 5y agoThey aren't, that's why they have shelters and contingency plans for themselves and their families. If life were fair, they shouldn't be allowed to survive a nuclear war that they start, but life is rarely fair.
- FredPret 5y agoThe universe is a collection of chemical and physical reactions. Fairness is a value judgement that is sometimes passed from inside our heads over the rest of the universe.