4 ms·

The space lasers were real /s (in reference to the Republican congresswoman who blamed the California wildfires on Jewish space lasers: https://nymag.com/intel

The space lasers were real /s (in reference to the Republican congresswoman who blamed the California wildfires on Jewish space lasers: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marjorie-taylor-greene-qanon-wildfires-space-laser-rothschild-execute.html https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marjorie-taylor-gree...)

m0llusk 5y ago
It really surprises me that so many people who have seen UFO reports all their lives cite this as nothing but humorous stupidity from a politician. People who follow satellite data in order to understand global patterns of earthquakes and weather saw what looks like beams from unknown sources hitting areas that then caught fire. As with anything else this is very likely to be some kind of sensor or transmission glitch that simply needs to be analyzed in detail to find some mundane explanation, but it is worth acknowledging that the whole business emerged not from the political foolishness that got attached to it later but from hobbyists trying to explain genuinely peculiar data. Even when people talk about UFOs or space lasers it is worth taking in and trying to explain the actual data.
- doodlebugging 5y ago
  > People who follow satellite data in order to understand global patterns of earthquakes and weather saw what looks like beams from unknown sources hitting areas that then caught fire. What? Is there a link to any of this or is it just standard internet BS? I've heard of earthquake lights and there may be something to that. Never heard of anything focused on places that later caught fire. The fires that I am aware of were mostly blamed on poor maintenance of electrical utility infrastructure or on arsonists or fools doing stupid stuff like "gender reveals". Enlighten me, but not with one of them space lasers, just about them.
  - m0llusk 5y ago
    At the time I saw the videos on YouTube postings from "dutchsinse". Why is it my job to do your research? Videos of what appear to be moving globs get people yelling about UFOs and now videos of what appear to be beams just before fires get people yelling about space lasers. Do you really think that being sloppy and full of emotion and attitude somehow makes you superior and on top of all of this? If you actually dared to read my post I posited that these were probably the usual misinterpretation of sensory or transmission glitches, but you are too scared to even look up what this is about in order to give some kind of meaningful and informed reply. All you care about is a political wingnut.
    - doodlebugging 5y ago
      Somewhere in the space between the period at the end of your first sentence and the capital W it looks like your meds failed you. Are you manic depressive? Do you spend your days locked away from real people to the point that you feel attacked whenever someone responds to one of your posts? You should spend some time watching network TV. I'm sure somewhere in the drivel you can find a pharmaceutical commercial for a product that will help you repair your problems relating to people. Your reply after the first sentence is a steadily deteriorating jumble of accusations and assumptions. You must have me confused with someone else or your reading comprehension skills are terrible. > Why is it my job to do your research? Standard forum etiquette for a long time has been to include sources for claims if those sources were requested. This helps to educate readers and to identify sources of misinformation thus keeping BS out of the stream, kind of like a mollusk, filtering all that water as it passes. If you had not indicated some familiarity with the subject matter then I would not have asked to see the source material. If being asked for source material is somehow embarrassing to you then that is a different issue. Your assumptions are all way off of the mark. "...sloppy and full of emotion attitude..." Wow, I really think you have me mixed up with someone else. >If you dared to read my post... The fact is that I did read your post and, as noted above, that is the reason that I requested a source. You set yourself out as someone who was familiar with and potentially in agreement with the data and I wanted to see the same data so that I could draw my own conclusions. >you are too scared... Again, you suggested that you had seen some of the space laser evidence and I requested a source. It has been "Tits or GTFO", "Pics or it didn't happen", etc forever online. What is your problem? >All you care about is a political wingnut. What? Your train of rational thought derailed several sentences back. With all the high-tech monitoring tools available to railroads, the wide adoption of cell phones with cameras, and the cancer of social media to help relay that information, I'm sure someone will be along directly to help you get back on track.

m0llusk 5y ago

It really surprises me that so many people who have seen UFO reports all their lives cite this as nothing but humorous stupidity from a politician. People who follow satellite data in order to understand global patterns of earthquakes and weather saw what looks like beams from unknown sources hitting areas that then caught fire. As with anything else this is very likely to be some kind of sensor or transmission glitch that simply needs to be analyzed in detail to find some mundane explanation, but it is worth acknowledging that the whole business emerged not from the political foolishness that got attached to it later but from hobbyists trying to explain genuinely peculiar data. Even when people talk about UFOs or space lasers it is worth taking in and trying to explain the actual data.

doodlebugging 5y ago
> People who follow satellite data in order to understand global patterns of earthquakes and weather saw what looks like beams from unknown sources hitting areas that then caught fire. What? Is there a link to any of this or is it just standard internet BS? I've heard of earthquake lights and there may be something to that. Never heard of anything focused on places that later caught fire. The fires that I am aware of were mostly blamed on poor maintenance of electrical utility infrastructure or on arsonists or fools doing stupid stuff like "gender reveals". Enlighten me, but not with one of them space lasers, just about them.
- m0llusk 5y ago
  At the time I saw the videos on YouTube postings from "dutchsinse". Why is it my job to do your research? Videos of what appear to be moving globs get people yelling about UFOs and now videos of what appear to be beams just before fires get people yelling about space lasers. Do you really think that being sloppy and full of emotion and attitude somehow makes you superior and on top of all of this? If you actually dared to read my post I posited that these were probably the usual misinterpretation of sensory or transmission glitches, but you are too scared to even look up what this is about in order to give some kind of meaningful and informed reply. All you care about is a political wingnut.
  - doodlebugging 5y ago
    Somewhere in the space between the period at the end of your first sentence and the capital W it looks like your meds failed you. Are you manic depressive? Do you spend your days locked away from real people to the point that you feel attacked whenever someone responds to one of your posts? You should spend some time watching network TV. I'm sure somewhere in the drivel you can find a pharmaceutical commercial for a product that will help you repair your problems relating to people. Your reply after the first sentence is a steadily deteriorating jumble of accusations and assumptions. You must have me confused with someone else or your reading comprehension skills are terrible. > Why is it my job to do your research? Standard forum etiquette for a long time has been to include sources for claims if those sources were requested. This helps to educate readers and to identify sources of misinformation thus keeping BS out of the stream, kind of like a mollusk, filtering all that water as it passes. If you had not indicated some familiarity with the subject matter then I would not have asked to see the source material. If being asked for source material is somehow embarrassing to you then that is a different issue. Your assumptions are all way off of the mark. "...sloppy and full of emotion attitude..." Wow, I really think you have me mixed up with someone else. >If you dared to read my post... The fact is that I did read your post and, as noted above, that is the reason that I requested a source. You set yourself out as someone who was familiar with and potentially in agreement with the data and I wanted to see the same data so that I could draw my own conclusions. >you are too scared... Again, you suggested that you had seen some of the space laser evidence and I requested a source. It has been "Tits or GTFO", "Pics or it didn't happen", etc forever online. What is your problem? >All you care about is a political wingnut. What? Your train of rational thought derailed several sentences back. With all the high-tech monitoring tools available to railroads, the wide adoption of cell phones with cameras, and the cancer of social media to help relay that information, I'm sure someone will be along directly to help you get back on track.