4 ms·
This isn't really safer. Driving behind a driver not keeping up with traffic and breaking erratically is a traffic hazard (happened to me a few days ago with a
by XorNot 5y ago
This isn't really safer.
Driving behind a driver not keeping up with traffic and breaking erratically is a traffic hazard (happened to me a few days ago with a human driver).
- akira2501 5y agoIt's generally a bad idea to fit safety regulations around the safety limitations of the item they're regulating. We set speeds, sometimes based on time of day or presence of children. Humans handle this just fine. If your car can't, then the car needs to be fixed or it's "self-driving" functionality entirely disabled. Changing speed limit laws to compensate for these limitations is entirely the wrong direction.
- XorNot 5y agoMy point is that FSD needs to be at least as capable as a human to follow speed limit signs. The problem generalises - it's also unacceptable for FSD not to keep up with traffic on a freeway or randomly throw in the brakes to avoid spurious hazards for the same reasons.
- userbinator 5y agoI remember the story on here a while ago about a self-driving car that got rear-ended because it stopped in the merging lane of an empty highway rather than accelerating like any human would...