3 ms·
Again, I was responding to this: >There is objectively nothing that NYT could add to the game to make it more interesting. It can only make it worse. What dis
by RC_ITR 5y ago
Again, I was responding to this:
>There is objectively nothing that NYT could add to the game to make it more interesting. It can only make it worse.
What discussion did THAT open?
EDIT: And I'm glad you're expressing opinions! That's the point of discourse. GP was doing something different and just because you agree with GP's opinion doesn't mean that his rhetorical choices are sound!
- kelnos 5y agoFair, an absolutist statement like that is pretty silly and obviously false. And whether any particular change makes a game better or worse is inherently subjective; "objectively nothing" is false by definition.