That’s not how the GDPR is written. It may seem premature, but someone has to be first to be ruled against in order for the interpretation to come into being, s

That’s not how the GDPR is written. It may seem premature, but someone has to be first to be ruled against in order for the interpretation to come into being, same as the Supreme Court and any other interpretive judicial systems. That the private fine is essentially a token throwaway amount reflects that the court isn’t trying to throw the book at them; one can imagine the court will be much more upset about the government instance you highlight if it remains unaddressed.