3 ms·
I mean, sure, if you insist on the strictly inferior solution, luckily for you it's still an option. I find it amusing that you explicitly want to send a priva
by boring_twenties 5y ago
I mean, sure, if you insist on the strictly inferior solution, luckily for you it's still an option.
I find it amusing that you explicitly want to send a private, anonymous and uncensorable transaction, but at the same time don't want to "involve yourself with" a technology that enables you to do exactly that.
- drekk 5y agoI'll stick with the "strictly inferior" solution that doesn't swing in value or require wasting electricity and silicon. There is no such thing as a 100% private, 100% anonymous, 100% uncensorable system, either.