3 ms·

arXiv have the advantage that they have LaTeX source for a majority of their submissions. Much easier to convert that to HTML that any arbitrary PDF.

evanb 5y ago
For any arXiv submission that was submitted via LaTeX, you can download the source.
jessriedel 5y ago
This was a very far-sighted move by, I believe, Paul Ginsparg back in the early days. It significantly increases the headache of submitting to the arXiv because you have to get your tex file to compile with the tex distribution on their servers rather than just on your own home box. But it makes the arxiv vastly more future proof than it would be if you could just upload PDFs.
- tingletech 5y ago
  I think arXiv / LANL preprint service predate PDF and the web (ftp and gopher). tex is seems more popular still in physics than other disciplines.
  - jessriedel 5y ago
    Yes, the arXiv started with PDF-less tex. (I believe people just compiled to postscripts files, which could be printed directly.) But when PDFs appeared, and especially as latex distributions became less standardized, there would have been a natural pressure to accept PDFs.
    - tingletech 5y ago
      yes, this is why they have accepted PDF for some time https://arxiv.org/help/submit_pdf https://arxiv.org/help/submit_pdf (maybe for as long as since 2004 -- but ironically archive.org could not access arXiv for some years https://web.archive.org/web/20041101000000*/https://arxiv.org/help/submit_pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20041101000000*/https://arxiv.or... ) Most other preprint services, such as those based on eprints (and in other disciplines) have always accepted PDF.
      - jessriedel 5y ago
        The reason they accept PDF is not because of the difficulty in getting tex files to compile on different distributions that I mentioned. Indeed, as they say on the page you link to, PDF files created from a tex file are specifically rejected by the arXiv. Rather, PDF files are accepted for the (fairly small minority) of papers that are written using alternative editors like MS Word.

evanb 5y ago

For any arXiv submission that was submitted via LaTeX, you can download the source.

jessriedel 5y ago

This was a very far-sighted move by, I believe, Paul Ginsparg back in the early days. It significantly increases the headache of submitting to the arXiv because you have to get your tex file to compile with the tex distribution on their servers rather than just on your own home box. But it makes the arxiv vastly more future proof than it would be if you could just upload PDFs.

tingletech 5y ago
I think arXiv / LANL preprint service predate PDF and the web (ftp and gopher). tex is seems more popular still in physics than other disciplines.
- jessriedel 5y ago
  Yes, the arXiv started with PDF-less tex. (I believe people just compiled to postscripts files, which could be printed directly.) But when PDFs appeared, and especially as latex distributions became less standardized, there would have been a natural pressure to accept PDFs.
  - tingletech 5y ago
    yes, this is why they have accepted PDF for some time https://arxiv.org/help/submit_pdf https://arxiv.org/help/submit_pdf (maybe for as long as since 2004 -- but ironically archive.org could not access arXiv for some years https://web.archive.org/web/20041101000000*/https://arxiv.org/help/submit_pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20041101000000*/https://arxiv.or... ) Most other preprint services, such as those based on eprints (and in other disciplines) have always accepted PDF.
    - jessriedel 5y ago
      The reason they accept PDF is not because of the difficulty in getting tex files to compile on different distributions that I mentioned. Indeed, as they say on the page you link to, PDF files created from a tex file are specifically rejected by the arXiv. Rather, PDF files are accepted for the (fairly small minority) of papers that are written using alternative editors like MS Word.