3 ms·
Being litigious and earning revenue from non-practicing patent ownership are fairly intertwined. Being a new company with no history is, likely, strategic. Pat
by netcan 5y ago
Being litigious and earning revenue from non-practicing patent ownership are fairly intertwined.
Being a new company with no history is, likely, strategic. Patent wars between practicing entities tend to be multi-front. Each side brings its own war chest of patents claims. Settlements tend to be more of a cease fire than a permanent end. They agree to stop suing each other.
Being non practicing means that a patent war can't interfere with your more important interests. Being clean slate means that whoever you sue can't return fire by going after the rest of your patent portfolio.
"Patent trolling" isn't black or white definitionally, but it has earned its bad name. It's an ugly game of dirty tricks.
- mathattack 5y agoAll good points. And if this is a new entity, it likely isn’t bound by any “you don’t sue us, and we don’t sue you” agreements. It could be new money in play. Of course it could just be financial engineering, though I suspect that would look more like an asset backed loan.
- netcan 5y ago"liability engineering" perhaps.