5 ms·
https://energy-charts.info/charts/energy/chart.htm?l=en&c=DE&year=-1&stacking=stacked_absolute&interval=year&legendItems=0011111111011110 https://energy-charts.
by patall 5y ago
https://energy-charts.info/charts/energy/chart.htm?l=en&c=DE&year=-1&stacking=stacked_absolute&interval=year&legendItems=0011111111011110 https://energy-charts.info/charts/energy/chart.htm?l=en&c=DE...
Would it look better with more nuclear? Quite possible.
Does the black bar (as an example) decrease with increase in solar and wind? Yes, very much so.
- tarsinge 5y agoSorry but no this is not what I call “very much”, nor “very well” as GP said. If you look at all the fossil bars (don’t forget the gas that would be too easy) it further prove my point that Germany really failed this decade and the trajectory is not looking good. Also for a reality check have a look at electricitymap.org when there is no wind and when it’s the night, I don’t see how ones could keep a straight face thinking they are doing good, this is the mix of the future for our cities.
- phicoh 5y agoCan you explain the 'not looking good' part? I see in 2002, Gas+Oil+Coal+Nuclear = 450 TWh. Then in 2021 this amounts to 262.98 TWh. So both nuclear and fossil fuel went down quite a bit. Looking just at the fossil fuel number, they went down by 96 TWh during that period. Seems like a significant win to me.