4 ms·
Where did you see in-proc D-Bus? It would be wildly inefficient compared to COM/gobject anyway.
by marwis 5y ago
Where did you see in-proc D-Bus? It would be wildly inefficient compared to COM/gobject anyway.
- pjmlp 5y agoCOM nowadays runs mostly out of process unless you like crashing the whole application, hence the reference to nano-COM for in-proc APIs that are basically OO ABI. That is why any modern Windows has plenty of COM Surrougate processes running at any given time. As for D-BUS, I stand corrected, I though it had such optimization in place, just as other mechanisms offer.
- marwis 5y agoThere's a ton of new in-proc COM usage through WinRT.
- pjmlp 5y agoYou mean the market failure that no one wants to use any more, even those of us that were early adopters? I am betting in 2 to 3 years we will have yet another reboot from WinUI and WinAppSDK. How things are, I wouldn't be surprised with Blazor with WebWidget2 as the new cool desktop UI.