3 ms·
> And the answer is that building out wind/solar and insulating buildings is at the moment way more effective than keeping old nuclear power plants running. Th
by kzrdude 5y ago
> And the answer is that building out wind/solar and insulating buildings is at the moment way more effective than keeping old nuclear power plants running.
This is already what we have been doing, and that's including that we can "make do" with energy savings.
It just doesn't close the gap. Nordics/northern europe need nuclear or equivalent power source to close the gap, or a revolution in energy storage.
I think we need more energy in the future, for all the green technology, not less. Energy is the currency, even more so than already, of the future economy.
- phicoh 5y agoThe problem we have is that in the past decade fossil fuel was way to cheap. This has now changed, but ramping up production of solar and wind takes a while. Fossil fuels are still way too cheap compared to storage of electricity. So there are lots of ways we could store electricity. But if you can't compete with a gas powered plant next door, it is not going to be built. At the same time, if you look at power consumption of data centers, it is amazing that so much of that can be ad supported.