4 ms·
There is a parallel in the history of workplace safety, e.g. i picked this one from google at random, all these histories tell the same thing: https://eh.net/
by hyperman1 5y ago
There is a parallel in the history of workplace safety, e.g. i picked this one from google at random, all these histories tell the same thing:
https://eh.net/encyclopedia/history-of-workplace-safety-in-the-united-states-1880-1970/ https://eh.net/encyclopedia/history-of-workplace-safety-in-t...
The sharp rise in accident costs that resulted from compensation laws and
tighter employers’ liability initiated the modern concern with work safety
and initiated the long-term decline in work accidents and injuries.
There was a long history of companies not caring about accidents and death in industry machinery. Companies claimed it was unavoidable, blamed their workers for doing this wrong, etc... Then the law made them care. The unsolvable non-problem turned out to be a solved problem in a few years. We also got some red tape as a side dish, but that's a good deal, all in all
Software is the same: If organizational leadership felt immediate pain from sloppiness, that sloppiness would disappear quickly. But now, we have fallen in a point where software gives no warranty at all, users have accepted the low quality as a regrettable fact of life, and companies attribute their low productivity to vague nebulous unsolvable mysteries instead of sloppy software. So here we are.
- the_only_law 5y ago> Then the law made them care. A while back I came across a couple channels from various government agencies and organizations that document industrial accidents. They were quite interesting to watch, but after watching several they make me wonder if the companies do care with or without the laws.
- scruple 5y agoI assume that they care if and when the fines would overtake the profits. With risk assessment being an entire field unto itself...