4 ms·

This assumption leads to the conclusion that only services that reside in the same jurisdiction (EU, USA, ...) can be used if legal protection from the state is

by danhor 5y ago

This assumption leads to the conclusion that only services that reside in the same jurisdiction (EU, USA, ...) can be used if legal protection from the state is desired. If legal protection from the state is enforced (even for other states) this means there need to be wholly separate services in each jurisdiction. This seems very undesirable, especially for the US with it's multinational web companies.

kazen44 5y ago
> This assumption leads to the conclusion that only services that reside in the same jurisdiction (EU, USA, ...) can be used if legal protection from the state is desired. which is the correct conclusion? As the state can only offer legal protection under its own jurisdiction. Sure, real life complicates things a bit. (mainly, the jurisdiction of the EU as an institution in and of itself compared to its member states is a messy affair) but it is still a totally valid argument none the less.
- simion314 5y ago
  >which is the correct conclusion? As the state can only offer legal protection under its own jurisdiction. Not sure I follow, US gov can't legally protect non US citizens from itself abusing them? It should be as hard for the spying to happen for an US or non US citizen or company.