The opening of this piece reminded me of papers showing that retracted peer reviewed papers still get cited (for evidentiary support) at high rates in the scien

The opening of this piece reminded me of papers showing that retracted peer reviewed papers still get cited (for evidentiary support) at high rates in the scientific literature. The ivermectin case is interesting too, as it's not exactly like ivermectin hasn't been scrutinized at this point. I'm not sure peer review as part of the publication process per se matters as much as it's made out to be.