That's again based on the work of Noyb and Max Schrems: In July 2020, the CJEU has issued its groundbreaking "Schrems II" ruling, holding that a transfer

That's again based on the work of Noyb and Max Schrems: In July 2020, the CJEU has issued its groundbreaking "Schrems II" ruling, holding that a transfer to US providers that fall under FISA 702 and EO 12.333 violate the rules on international data transfers in the GDPR. The CJEU consequently annulled the transfer deal "Privacy Shield", after annulling the previous deal "Safe Harbor" in 2015. While this sent shock waves through the tech industry, US providers and EU data exporters have largely ignored the case. Just like Microsoft, Facebook or Amazon, Google has relied on so-called "Standard Contract Clauses" to continue data transfers and calm its European business partners. Max Schrems, honorary chair of noyb.eu: "Instead of actually adapting services to be GDPR compliant, US companies have tried to simply add some text to their privacy policies and ignore the Court of Justice. Many EU companies have followed the lead instead of switching to legal options." https://noyb.eu/en/austrian-dsb-eu-us-data-transfers-google-analytics-illegal https://noyb.eu/en/austrian-dsb-eu-us-data-transfers-google-... https://noyb.eu/en/101-complaints-eu-us-transfers-filed https://noyb.eu/en/101-complaints-eu-us-transfers-filed https://noyb.eu/en/update-noybs-101-complaints-eu-us-data-transfers https://noyb.eu/en/update-noybs-101-complaints-eu-us-data-tr...