I said that I don't resent the dev cashing in, and I said why the clones aren't a substitute. Your comment amounts to "that's how it is, deal": zero informatio

I said that I don't resent the dev cashing in, and I said why the clones aren't a substitute. Your comment amounts to "that's how it is, deal": zero information content, just an expression of a rather ugly attitude. I know that's how it is and whether I choose to be mad at NYT for it is entirely up to me. The fact that someone made money doing something doesn't oblige me to not think they're a dick for doing it. Talking of which, whether the NYT do in fact make any money out of this remains to be seen. By buying it for 7 figures they've set themselves a high bar for that. It's entirely possible they'll end up having messed up something people were enjoying and lost both money and goodwill in the process. Kudos to the dev whatever happens, though.