3 ms·
This discussion is fine in and of itself. This discussion and any outcomes have nothing to do with technical debt. If stakeholders are aware of design decision
by louwrentius 5y ago
This discussion is fine in and of itself. This discussion and any outcomes have nothing to do with technical debt.
If stakeholders are aware of design decisions and related cost + understand the potential trade-off, that’s it.
No need to add concepts like technical debt. And this example would not even be technical debt according to Ward Cunningham’s definition.
- anamax 5y agoIt's not clear how to distinguish my example from every other shortcut that people do to get things out the door. (It's not the numbers - growth can jump to 100% if marketing gets its act together.) While Ward Cunningham may have introduced the term, his definition is obviously not the one that most people use, so it's pretty irrelevant.