Of course science is about discussing stances. Conclusions and hypotheses are stances taken on an interpretation of data. The authors present data and demonstra

Of course science is about discussing stances. Conclusions and hypotheses are stances taken on an interpretation of data. The authors present data and demonstrate why a particular stance would be a misinterpretation. > I thought it was about conducting specific methodical experiments in an unbiased way to reach an unknown conclusion. How could you specify an experiment to conduct to test whether a conclusion is valid without an apriori examination of said conclusion (stance) and determining what evidence would support or refute it?