2 ms·
The HN comments are of course great, but what is the best way to follow the ongoing discussion of this proposal, it's merits/drawbacks and barriers to adoption?
by ttymck 5y ago
The HN comments are of course great, but what is the best way to follow the ongoing discussion of this proposal, it's merits/drawbacks and barriers to adoption? Is the working group's mailing list used for this purpose, or does feedback come from the public forum, i.e. This comments section, blog posts, etc.?
- schanzen 5y agoTo be honest: I would prefer our mailing list for discussions (see top post). Our email addresses are also in the draft. A lot of discussions happen via the IETF Datatracker infrastructure and internal email discussions/meetings. We have a monthly gnunet jour fixe and we do post news entries (https://www.gnunet.org https://www.gnunet.org) We dropped our IRC channel when the freenode apocalypse happened.