You shouldn't be. Are you anxious to censor Brainfuck for example? [1] When you censor, you make the case for an argument to become weaker not stronger. You are

You shouldn't be. Are you anxious to censor Brainfuck for example? [1] When you censor, you make the case for an argument to become weaker not stronger. You are hiding the knowledge to show another way in which something is invalid. The end result invariably will be that you make what initially could be science, to become propaganda. The natural selection of paradigms do not require censorship anyway. Reality will reveal itself and always win in the long run. Propaganda is always an epoch phenomena that doesn't pass the test of time. It's like a counterfeited wannabe classic posing as timeless but always revealing itself as some kind of fraud in the end. And without unconditional love to truth and reality you make impossible to do true philosophy, hence true science. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck