> So technically http/2 is faster, but it is only possible with https. Because of arbitrary client restrictions. http/2 can be unencrypted, and would be faster

> So technically http/2 is faster, but it is only possible with https. Because of arbitrary client restrictions. http/2 can be unencrypted, and would be faster unencrypted than encrypted. It's just that all servers/clients decided to not implement the optional unencrypted mode. I'm not arguing either way, but technically it is possible to do it without https.