3 ms·
If we don't know, this means there's no legal basis for far-reaching restrictions of constitutional rights such as lockdowns, curfews, contact restrictions, con
by tannhaeuser 5y ago
If we don't know, this means there's no legal basis for far-reaching restrictions of constitutional rights such as lockdowns, curfews, contact restrictions, contact tracing, compulsory vaccination, and restrictions of freedom of assembly. We do know, though, that current hospitalization and IC rates are relatively low, and that most of the above measures turned out to be pretty ineffective for highly infectious strains, making their justification even weaker.
- vanusa 5y agoI take no position on those restrictions - or Denmark's recent decision to lift its restrictions. I just don't see any benefit to the empty, unscientific declaration that it is "no longer a threat to society" (which may or may not be what the Danish PM actually said) -- other than for the sake of political posturing.
- a0-prw 5y agoIt has legal implications in Denmark. If it is officially no longer a threat to society, there is no basis for restrictions.