3 ms·
This question seems to have an implicit assumption that buying a house is a superior investment than other investment vehicles. I believe it's been shown that
by sghiassy 5y ago
This question seems to have an implicit assumption that buying a house is a superior investment than other investment vehicles.
I believe it's been shown that investing in equities outperforms housing historically.
- deanmoriarty 5y agoIt’s not superior per se, but with real estate you can get cheap non-callable leverage that is almost impossible to replicate with equity investments. That’s how it becomes superior. Find me a broker that will lend 5X the value of my stock portfolio at 3% fixed for 30 years, and won’t issue a margin call if the market drops 50% as long as I pay the interest and monthly repayment, and I promise I would never look at real estate at all. Until then, it makes complete sense to dabble with it.
- ChrisLomont 5y agoTop 5 hits on google disagree - they're pretty close, and most years it looks like real estate outperforms. Plus you need a place to live. Factor in rent costs to the investment side, and you're losing value for investing returns. Factor in a lot of nice tricks you get with real estate (tax break for interest, ability to flip up with no capital gains along the way, dozens more), and housing is a pretty good investment. https://www.investopedia.com/investing/reasons-invest-real-estate-vs-stock-market/ https://www.investopedia.com/investing/reasons-invest-real-e... https://www.millionacres.com/real-estate-investing/articles/real-estate-vs-stocks-which-has-better-historical-returns/ https://www.millionacres.com/real-estate-investing/articles/...