> That sounds like an argument for better payment mechanisms but people still need to be paid. Paying people for good content doesn't fix the problem. The int

> That sounds like an argument for better payment mechanisms but people still need to be paid. Paying people for good content doesn't fix the problem. The internet is still cluttered with awful content drowning out the useful stuff. Not because people are trying hard and learning or just plain love their awful guitar playing even if nobody is watching, but because they're getting paid by surveillance. What we need is the absence of that incentive. This is one of those cases where the free market would actually fix the problem if there was some sensible regulation applied. Sadly it'll never be quick enough to catch up with the technology.