3 ms·
> But will "Manifest V3" tip things back to unbearable? We'll see. Switch to Firefox now before Firefox market share dips to the level where publishers can ju
by Macha 5y ago
> But will "Manifest V3" tip things back to unbearable? We'll see.
Switch to Firefox now before Firefox market share dips to the level where publishers can justify not supporting it and you're stuck with only crippled adblocking forever?
- sneak 5y agoIf a browser doesn't render the web properly, that's the browser's fault, not the web's.
- npteljes 5y agoNot really, no. It's the publisher's fault if they targeted the browser in the first place. If they didn't, and it didn't render properly, then it's nobody's fault, just something that happens.
- throwaway81523 5y agoNo, you don't WANT to see the web rendered "properly" (with all the ads). The browser+adblocker do the best they can to render the usably rather than "properly". The issue is that it may become impossible to render usably.
- Fice 5y agoThis is not enough if we don't stop DRM (which Firefox also supports). DRM essentially means: only allow access with a program that implements certain required measures to restrict user's control over their own computer. Using content decryption blobs to restrict user's access to media streams handled by their own computer — is only a beginning, Web DRM will be eventually extended to allow more restrictions, including those to make it much harder to interfere with the display of ads.