4 ms·

"By calling the vaccine "rushed" and implying it can't be trusted," I already said this isn't true. It's already a facile argument when you say "the vaccine" k

by tootie 5y ago

"By calling the vaccine "rushed" and implying it can't be trusted," I already said this isn't true. It's already a facile argument when you say "the vaccine" knowing that multiple are in production. Biden, Harris and Fauci all very unequivocally endorsed the vaccines that passed the rigorous approval processes laid by my medical experts. Trump said vaccines cause autism repeatedly and as recently as 2015 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/health/trump-vaccines.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/health/trump-vaccines.htm... He endorsed Hydroxychloroquine and injecting disinfectants.

0xy 5y ago
>I already said this isn't true. But you didn't prove it. Your source doesn't mention it, mine does. At this point, it's merely conjecture on your part. I cited a source for my claim.
- tootie 5y ago
  No. Your cites don't support your claims at all. Fauci said (then backtracked) that the UK rushed the final regulatory approval of the Pfizer vaccine. Not that the vaccine production and testing had been rushed nor that that the US had rushed anything. And certainly not that there was actually anything wrong with that particular vaccine or any other vaccine that got approval. He was merely expressing surprise that there wasn't a redundant government review of data as there was in the US.