4 ms·
Make sure your big $$$ are not available easily. Find a bank/brokerage that will actually do their job verifying you before they dispense your money. You are n
by lmilcin 5y ago
Make sure your big $$$ are not available easily. Find a bank/brokerage that will actually do their job verifying you before they dispense your money.
You are not able to defend yourself from targeted attacks. Period.
It is one thing to try to defend from attacks of opportunity (ie. viruses, ransomware, etc.) and another from people who actually know their job and for some reason find yourself attractive target.
Thus, the best way to respond is to not make yourself attractive target in the first place and if you need to have attractive things somewhere -- separate them from everything else.
- brian_herman 5y agoPutnam investments are really hard to get money out of. For example, I tried to cash in an annuity, and it required a medallion certificate by another bank. A medallion certificate is like a notary but is only done by another bank.
- rdtsc 5y agoDepends how motivated the attackers are. They can try to find another bank with weaker rules, perhaps open an account there first. I needed one of those things, and shopped around for a bit. And while all the big names would refuse, had waiting periods, fees, other requirements, a local credit union gave me one after signing up for a savings account immediately with a minimal or no fee.
- xoa 5y ago>Depends how motivated the attackers are. They can try to find another bank with weaker rules, perhaps open an account there first. That isn't really incentivized in this case. Assuming by medallion certificate they meant "medallion signature guarantee" [0] as established by SEC Rule 17 Ad-15 [1], a core part of the system there is that the financial institution granting it accepts liability for any forgery, up to a specified prefix amount (and the transaction will be rejected if the stamp isn't enough to cover the transaction amount). So if they "find another bank with weaker rules" who gets them to issue a stamp for a few hundred grand they are on the hook for that loss. As a result, it's actually taken pretty seriously at least for significant amounts of money. This specific area isn't one where the guarantor gets to shrug their shoulders about it. Since they're going to be on the hook for hundreds of thousands to millions if they get it wrong, you need to be a known, established customer to even try, go in person, and someone higher level is absolutely going to looking at it personally. And even if an attacker did get past all that, the whole point is the one being attacked still hasn't lost anything. >a local credit union gave me one after signing up for a savings account immediately with a minimal or no fee. What prefix though? How did you check out in terms of signup (long history as resident? local connections?)? Lots of stuff goes on behind the scenes. An F alpha prefix ($100k surety, credit union) isn't the same thing as a Z ($14 million surety). ---- 0: https://www.mybanktracker.com/blog/investing/medallion-signature-guarantee-277286 https://www.mybanktracker.com/blog/investing/medallion-signa... 1: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/240.17Ad-15 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/240.17Ad-15
- brian_herman 5y agoYes, exactly I meant medallion signature guarantee thank you sorry I didn't use exact terminology.
- rdtsc 5y ago> That isn't really incentivized in this case. Some smaller credit unions or local banks are less rigorous it seems and that incentivizes whoever wants to steal the money to go there with a fake ID, bills, etc. > What prefix though? F. Still a nice chunk of money for someone to steal. I guess, what I was surprised about was how different the rules were. Some quite strict, at large institutions, some pretty lax. > How did you check out in terms of signup (long history as resident? local connections?)? Called around and visited a few banks in the area. Not sure if / how they checked the history as a resident? There was no prior relationship with that particular credit union. As you say, perhaps behind the scene they did a rather thorough background check, but it just didn't feel that way at all based on the context.