> Science and academia have pushed [...] to convince [...] that random YouTube videos are, in fact, better sources for truthful information. I don't follow, co

> Science and academia have pushed [...] to convince [...] that random YouTube videos are, in fact, better sources for truthful information. I don't follow, could you please expand? I don't see how YouTube could be a better source for certain fields of information (say, medicine) than a collection of scientific studies.