> As an end product, I would have doubts that anyone could hear a difference past 24/48. Honestly 16/44.1 is just fine for most people. On both accounts I agre

> As an end product, I would have doubts that anyone could hear a difference past 24/48. Honestly 16/44.1 is just fine for most people. On both accounts I agree. But since many can hear the difference between 16/44 and 24/48, and all agree 24/48 is aurally superior, it would be nice to have it available when desired. I somewhat disagree on several points with the author of the article, and I think many of his declarative statements are purely opinion the fact of which he neatly obfuscates with some legitimate scientific facts.