3 ms·
We’re working on a security definition which means “control of system”. That means escaping the compartment: for iMessage that means escaping the sandbox. The m
by olliej 5y ago
We’re working on a security definition which means “control of system”. That means escaping the compartment: for iMessage that means escaping the sandbox. The most recent one on the PZ blog is a multiparty series and I don’t believe they’ve described how NSO gets from code execution to actually escaping the sandbox. If being able to escape the sandboxing means “not compartmentalized” then if anyone escapes the VM in qubes then qubes is also not compartmentalized. The difference is how extreme the compartmentalization is. macOS and iOS use sandboxing which is much lighter weight than a full VM, but is not as strong a boundary as a full VM. However saying that they’re not a form of compartmentalization is plainly false.
Every other virtualisation system also uses hardware virtualisation. They’ve been popped. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suspect that qubes has not had the same degree of offensive interest as, say, VMware.
- fsflover 5y ago> They’ve been popped. I would be grateful if you could provide some links. > I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suspect that qubes has not had the same degree of offensive interest as, say, VMware. Qubes relies on Xen. The latter definitely had a lot of offensive interest. I am not aware of any recent escapes of hardware virtualization though.