3 ms·
Once again: > Can you describe what sort of evidence would convince you that this movement is a problem, other than the political affiliations and concerns of
by noisefridge 5y ago
Once again:
> Can you describe what sort of evidence would convince you that this movement is a problem, other than the political affiliations and concerns of the organizers, the behavior of people on the ground, the symbols on display, and what actions they are calling for?
- totony 5y agoMore importantly, why do you insist on labelling them as a problem? What do you propose be done once you do label them as "a problem"?
- MatteoFrigo 5y agoYours is a pathetic rhetorical attempt to reduce a complex issue to your narrow-minded ontology. You are like the dude who, during the plague of 1630 in Italy, was arguing that Aristotle had said that everything is either a substance or an accident (where "accident" has a technical meaning that I won't discuss here). He then argued that the plague cannot be a substance, and it cannot be an accident either, and therefore the plague does not exist. QED. Small minds discuss people. Great minds discuss ideas.