3 ms·
Sure, why not? There are those that dismiss all sightings as aberrations and lies and don't believe there are actual objects that are flying around our atmosphe
by bostonsre 5y ago
Sure, why not? There are those that dismiss all sightings as aberrations and lies and don't believe there are actual objects that are flying around our atmosphere. Then there are people that believe there are actual objects that are flying around but don't know wtf they are.
- wumpus 5y agoExtraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. I think you're misrepresenting the first group.
- bostonsre 5y agoWhat does requiring extraordinary evidence have to do with there being two different buckets of people, those that believe in there being actual unknown objects and those that don't believe there are actual unknown objects flying around? Or how am I misrepresenting them? To be skeptical and not believe in them seems logical to me as does believing there is some weird unknown (from the standpoint of the US government) crap flying around (the david fravor interviews and the videos released by the pentagon are definitely something that made me go from no friggin way do they exist to making me pause and go wtf.. i guess its plausible that their is weird unknown stuff flying around).