3 ms·
As an end product, I would have doubts that anyone could hear a difference past 24/48. Honestly 16/44.1 is just fine for most people. Especially when you run it
by ehutch79 5y ago
As an end product, I would have doubts that anyone could hear a difference past 24/48. Honestly 16/44.1 is just fine for most people. Especially when you run it through a lossy container.
That said. A lot of people in the audio production space see stuff like this, and apply it to recording, where the loss of definition compounds. Also, aliasing is a major thing.
So just because you don't need to be downloading 24/192 audio from spotify, don't say audio interfaces supporting it is pointless
- Maursault 5y ago> As an end product, I would have doubts that anyone could hear a difference past 24/48. Honestly 16/44.1 is just fine for most people. On both accounts I agree. But since many can hear the difference between 16/44 and 24/48, and all agree 24/48 is aurally superior, it would be nice to have it available when desired. I somewhat disagree on several points with the author of the article, and I think many of his declarative statements are purely opinion the fact of which he neatly obfuscates with some legitimate scientific facts.