2 ms·
Except some disagreeable speech is different than others, e.g., hate speech -- that is speech advocating violence towards classes of people. And the right is v
by pstuart 5y ago
Except some disagreeable speech is different than others, e.g., hate speech -- that is speech advocating violence towards classes of people.
And the right is very comfortable suppressing speech when it comes to their boogeyman du jour, "CRT".
That said, of course censorship is a dangerous thing but some "free speech" is also dangerous in itself. Right-wing talk radio and Fox have engaged in speech designed to cause division and hate in America. It's covert hate speech and I'm not suggesting that it be censored but it sure as hell should not be celebrated.
- klyrs 5y agoDriving cross-country with the radio on is a real education. Right wing talk radio is not "covert" hate speech. After 9/11, it became a safe space for outright racist calls for violence against Muslims and people of middle eastern descent. In the leadup to Obama's presidency, it became normal to hear racial slurs and calls for violence against black people. Usually not the host or their guests, but from a huge number of call-ins, and the hosts rarely cut off or even disagree with those callers.
- pstuart 5y agoYeah, I was trying to minimize any sort backlash to my comment. It really is hate speech. When people make assertations about free speech and "disagreeable" content it grinds my gears. It's one thing to say that Nickleback is the best band ever and another to say that all Mexicans are rapists, drug dealers, and/or murderers. I do understand that censorship is a dangerous thing, but we're also playing with fire by giving megaphones to hatemongers. It's my (obviously limited) observation that a solid chunk of the American public would be fine with exterminating "the others" if it was allowed to happen. That isn't by happenstance and it shows no signs of abating (quite the opposite really).