4 ms·
Okay, how about different analogy. Abovementioned artists use their weight to manipulate unrelated third party to get back at another artist. That's the game ot
by kova12 5y ago
Okay, how about different analogy. Abovementioned artists use their weight to manipulate unrelated third party to get back at another artist. That's the game others can also play. As someone noticed, Rogan has a devoted and large following. What if he entices his followers to respond in-kind? Perhaps a listener who happens to work in IRS can trigger an extensive audit. Or a cop pull over one of these guys and check them for some medical marijuana, like they did with Willie Nelson. We live in society, you know, and if you think people around these two cannot mess up their lives you are very mistaken. Is that really what you want us to descend to though? Or perhaps we live and leave others alone like descent people should, and look for peace not confrontation
- commoner 5y agoJoe Rogan is also free to leave Spotify if he doesn't want to stay on it for any reason. There's nothing wrong with that, either. If there's strong evidence that someone committed a crime like tax fraud, then they should be investigated. Whether they choose to publish content on Spotify or not is irrelevant.
- kova12 5y agoYou either ignored or didn't understand anything I wrote One thing to add is what those two are doing is not actually so legal as you think. If this ends in court, a pretty solid case for tortuous interference with contract. It is not illegal to quit Spotify. But it is actually illegal to do so with intent to interfere with another contract.
- commoner 5y agoI fully understood what you wrote, and I am not buying your argument. A claim of tortious interference would be rejected by the court because nobody was actually harmed.