It's a worthwhile article to read for sure. But I can get past your troll-of-a-term "free speech privilege." It's as if you are attempting to downgrade the pri

It's a worthwhile article to read for sure. But I can get past your troll-of-a-term "free speech privilege." It's as if you are attempting to downgrade the principle of freedom of speech to limit it to describing an annoying pattern of rich guys mouthing off. (And completing the example from the "other rich guy" in this instance.) What's the upshot here? Are you a staunch supporter of freedom of speech or not? I can't tell at all from your comment nor from the text of the article (which is merely a review of Neil Young's output).