2 ms·
That would have been fun! But in this case it doesn't work. The PIE root is *h₁ger- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%B
by kranner 5y ago
That would have been fun! But in this case it doesn't work. The PIE root is *h₁ger-
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%97%E...
- samatman 5y agoExcept this appears to be a mistake! (Read on, it isn't) If we follow the Sanskrt we get the cognate jaagarti: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/जागर्ति#Sanskrit https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/जागर्ति#Sanskrit Which lists the root as *h₁ger- (“to be awake, to awaken”). But that root is missing from Wiktionary, which isn't a good sign, but compare: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/weǵ- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Eur... Although tracing this forward I see the obvious derivatives (vajra, vaaja) and it would be peculiar, but not unheard of, for the word to take two mutations. I'm basically on a random walk at this point, but here's that missing root again https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ἐγείρω#Ancient_Greek https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ἐγείρω#Ancient_Greek and I am once again left wondering... Exitare! Ok. Nope completely different roots. Someone should really write up *h₁ger- it's pretty important...