4 ms·

> Apple cant do this on its servers either, considering it has no server product Wat? https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro/rack https://www.apple.com/sh

by mike_d 5y ago

> Apple cant do this on its servers either, considering it has no server product Wat? https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro/rack https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro/rack https://www.apple.com/macos/server/ https://www.apple.com/macos/server/

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
drzaiusapelord 5y ago
I'm skeptic this is what they're populating their datacenters with. These are niche products for smaller businesses. I meant they are not powering their cloud with these products. Apple's icloud is partly their datacenter running a mix of systems/hardware and renting out Amazon and Google cloud units, which are Intel/AMD.
- mike_d 5y ago
  Two hours ago you didn't even know they made servers, so your statement about how niche you think they are isn't super relevant. Google populates it's datacenters with their own servers. So does Facebook. So does Amazon. Netflix builds their own CDN appliances. Apple absolutely could if they wanted to.
  - drzaiusapelord 5y ago
    Define "own servers" because this discussion is about controlling the entire stack, and eliminating things like ME or PSP. FANG runs on AMD/Intel, so they don't own their own stack. They have to contend with the AMD/Intel product. Buying a beige box to put an intel chip is not "your own" servers in the context of this discussion. I'm not sure why you're so rude and confrontational here. We're discussing how Apple has top to bottom control in its consumer devices, not some weird discussion about datacenter packaging. Servers run on AMD/Intel and as such are stuck with the elements of those platforms AMD and Intel dictate. That's not having the entire stack to themselves.
    - mike_d 5y ago
      I think you seem to be confusing what is available in the public cloud and on Newegg for what companies use internally. Custom silicon is extremely prevalent and it doesn't all run on AMD/Intel.
dreamcompiler 5y ago
These things are servers in name only. Apple used to build true servers (the Xserve line) with true server operating systems, but they stopped building both around the time Steve Jobs died. Using today's MacOS as a server is an exercise in pain, largely because there are a number of routine server administration tasks that fundamentally require the GUI in MacOS.

by mike_d 5y ago

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

drzaiusapelord 5y ago

I'm skeptic this is what they're populating their datacenters with. These are niche products for smaller businesses. I meant they are not powering their cloud with these products. Apple's icloud is partly their datacenter running a mix of systems/hardware and renting out Amazon and Google cloud units, which are Intel/AMD.

mike_d 5y ago
Two hours ago you didn't even know they made servers, so your statement about how niche you think they are isn't super relevant. Google populates it's datacenters with their own servers. So does Facebook. So does Amazon. Netflix builds their own CDN appliances. Apple absolutely could if they wanted to.
- drzaiusapelord 5y ago
  Define "own servers" because this discussion is about controlling the entire stack, and eliminating things like ME or PSP. FANG runs on AMD/Intel, so they don't own their own stack. They have to contend with the AMD/Intel product. Buying a beige box to put an intel chip is not "your own" servers in the context of this discussion. I'm not sure why you're so rude and confrontational here. We're discussing how Apple has top to bottom control in its consumer devices, not some weird discussion about datacenter packaging. Servers run on AMD/Intel and as such are stuck with the elements of those platforms AMD and Intel dictate. That's not having the entire stack to themselves.
  - mike_d 5y ago
    I think you seem to be confusing what is available in the public cloud and on Newegg for what companies use internally. Custom silicon is extremely prevalent and it doesn't all run on AMD/Intel.

dreamcompiler 5y ago

These things are servers in name only. Apple used to build true servers (the Xserve line) with true server operating systems, but they stopped building both around the time Steve Jobs died. Using today's MacOS as a server is an exercise in pain, largely because there are a number of routine server administration tasks that fundamentally require the GUI in MacOS.