3 ms·
I think Siegler is missing the forest for the trees. The real question is not whether Microsoft should have dumped "legacy Windows"; in many respects, for ARM-b
by CurtHagenlocher 15y ago
I think Siegler is missing the forest for the trees. The real question is not whether Microsoft should have dumped "legacy Windows"; in many respects, for ARM-based mobile devices, it actually has. The more interesting issues are around two industry-wide trends -- the increasing commodification of software, and the re-verticalization of software and hardware -- and whether the Windows business model itself might be in danger of obsolescence.
Also worth noting: for Windows Phone 7, Microsoft did actually ditch backwards compatibility in favor of "the new thing". And despite generally favorable reviews, it's not exactly burning up the sales charts.
- technoslut 15y agoIt was easy for MS to ditch compatibility for Windows Mobile. It never was as dominant as the PC share so they could afford to start with a clean slate. In terms of ARM tablets, I assume that the only reason to have desktop mode is so it can run Office, however limited the features may be since it would take much too long to make it Metro/touch-friendly. MS isn't completely cutting the cord like Hastings is doing.